Because by being a slave, he would be able to share the virtues of the master and elevate himself. Aristotle stated that slavery benefited the slaves as well. Slaves are considered necessary because they provide leisure that was most essential for the welfare of the state. This is part of the very Aristotelian method of. So, this set-up naturally makes the former the master, and the latter the slave. To open the third book of the Politics, Aristotle considers citizenship and who counts as a citizen. The masters are stated to be physically and mentally strong than the slaves. In other words, people with superior reasoning powers would rule over those inferior in reasoning. In part 1, i have covered Aristotle's introduction and his. The superior would rule over the inferior just as the soul rules over the body and reason over appetite. 67K views 2 years ago INDIA This is part 2 of aristotle video series in which I have covered Aristotle's theory of citizenship. He also categorically stated that slave belonged to the master and not vice versa.Īristotle justified the institution of slavery on the following grounds: Natural: He further stated that as there are inequalities with reference to their capabilities and capacities, all those who had higher capacities were called masters and the rest are slaves. The logic given by him was that those who were not virtuous were slaves and that it was possible to determine who is virtuous and who is not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |